theos911
Well-Known Member
My econ teacher has been teaching since the late 70's and is retiring this year. I question whether his replacement will have his same middle of the road approach that has given me the chance to see both sides.Nice work. You must have been paying attention in civics class,huh? You would not believe the amount of people who could not explain capitalism as eloquently or coherently as you just did. Bravo.
Personally I believe a lot of the problem at the federal level is because of the progressive era restructuring of our legislative system. Namely, direct election of senators. When Senators were appointed by State legislators they were the voices of the states at the federal level. Now that they are elected, they are subject to the same lobbyist problems that the house is. In one fall swoop the states lost a voice and the special interest / corporate / lobbyists groups gained immensely. More importantly, whereas the senate was originally a check on the house passing things to get reelected, the senate now is subjected to the same "Will this get me reelected?" The average campaign debt of a new senator is a quarter million dollars. You think he pays that himself? No, groups pay him for votes. The 17th. amendment put a nice "For Sale" sign on the capitol building and we are reaping its effects today.
Funny how those old guys sitting in a stuffy Philadelphia room two hundred years ago actually had some powerful foresight.