Fratzog
Old Man with a Hat
Missed this thread first time around. Nice score and silver is a great colour. I'm a tit man like you.
You will... then you'll see how the designers really wanted them to look.Not yet. But I think I'll do it at some point, just to see if I like the car that way.
I want a '73, just so I can keep the tits on.You will... then you'll see how the designers really wanted them to look.
Me too, along with one of my HOOTERS plates on the front.I want a '73, just so I can keep the tits on.
You will... then you'll see how the designers really wanted them to look.
I want a '73, just so I can keep the tits on.
Think about it... They're not going to spend tons of time and money redesigning the whole front bumper on a car that is in its last year of production with the new formal body coming out the following year. They slapped those hideous appendages on as a last minute bandage to meet the those retarded crash standards. Those cars were designed at minimum, 2 years prior and they didn't want to drop one more dime on them knowing full well they will be replaced with proper crash bumpers in the following year. What designer in their right mind would want that crap on a beautiful grill and rear bumper like these cars have.Your statement would be correct (i) if we were talking about Ming's rear bumper or (ii) if Ming were a 1973 Imperial -- as the latter's low production volume allowed the 1973 MY to be exempted from a full bumper redesign.
Those cars were designed at minimum, 2 years prior
and they didn't want to drop one more dime on them knowing full well they will be replaced with proper crash bumpers in the following year.
What designer in their right mind would want that crap on a beautiful grill and rear bumper like these cars have.
I second the opinion that the upcoming bumper legislation was known to the industry as early as 1971.
Here is some more contempoprary reading on that topic:
LIFE, August 13, 1971
Popular Science, October 1972
Popular Science, April 1973