"It's a reproduction, albeit sometimes horrible quality, of the original factory assembly documents. "
Fury Pursuit's assessment of this book confirms my fears/suspicions. Faxon claims to have someone on staff who is an "expert" on these books, but refused to divulge any names. Knowing how Chrysler approached their graphics books, I would suspect that any engine assembly manual would have as many common pages as possible, i.e. if something on a 440 for example was used or typical for "B" and "C" body car applications it would be listed in the change block in the lower right of each page. Also, if a drawing of a particular detail could be used and/or reused for more than one model year, they'd do that as well, again noting the applications at the bottom of the sheet. Trying to recompile those sheets to "just " cover one model year and one body platform - Cbody versus Bbody for example would be a ridiculous amount of work. As for the copy quality, some of the "original" pages may be many generations of copy away from "the" original, and as everybody knows , every time you copy a copy and use the new copy as your master sheet, it deteriorates more and more. So there "might" be some excuse for that.
Fury Pursuit's assessment of this book confirms my fears/suspicions. Faxon claims to have someone on staff who is an "expert" on these books, but refused to divulge any names. Knowing how Chrysler approached their graphics books, I would suspect that any engine assembly manual would have as many common pages as possible, i.e. if something on a 440 for example was used or typical for "B" and "C" body car applications it would be listed in the change block in the lower right of each page. Also, if a drawing of a particular detail could be used and/or reused for more than one model year, they'd do that as well, again noting the applications at the bottom of the sheet. Trying to recompile those sheets to "just " cover one model year and one body platform - Cbody versus Bbody for example would be a ridiculous amount of work. As for the copy quality, some of the "original" pages may be many generations of copy away from "the" original, and as everybody knows , every time you copy a copy and use the new copy as your master sheet, it deteriorates more and more. So there "might" be some excuse for that.