“Deputy Director McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information,” the memo claims, referring to the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Asked if that was a true representation, a source familiar with McCabe’s testimony responded: “100% not.”
Once again "a source". At this point, is "a source" enough? Almost be definition, this source is violating an oath. But they are to believed because?
I'm curious... could anyone tell me exactly how Russia influenced our election?
Not "they offered dirt", but exactly what did these two do that resonated with so many Americans outside of a major city?
View attachment 165935