It doesn't look like it has terrible rust issues. What the hell are those red lights mounted on the package tray?
On the surface, no.
The rear tail lights were not working.
So here we are with last nights (5/10) attendees, this time a bit more Mopars.
.......65' Plymouth vert'. As the story goes this is a one owner car---first guy had it for 47 years until it was sold to this dude. It was in decent shape for its age, didn't look like it was thrashed any....273 2bbl motor/auto trans..
.we were the only 70' c body cars there.
Yeah, typically. However.....the factory lights were not working. It was just wrong. Personally, I would have left it at home until I got all the lights working properly....and had a set of 4 duplicate tires.....and made sure there was nothing burning underneath the hood. It was probably sitting for a long while in someone's barn (or yard) until just recently.My guess would be these are additional brake lights, often seen in Europe in the 80s, were meant to warning drivers further than immediately behind you in case of fast stops.
You get the idea.which make it a two owner car
Next time I'll try and find out....hard to compete with the ice cream stand.Its got dealer tags on it. I wonder what the story is
I have never seen ONE #1 300H
So here we are with last nights (5/10) attendees, this time a bit more Mopars.
.......65' Plymouth vert'. As the story goes this is a one owner car---first guy had it for 47 years until it was sold to this dude. It was in decent shape for its age, didn't look like it was thrashed any....273 2bbl motor/auto trans..
I don't know very much about these cars. Are the valve covers on the wrong sides or is it the heater hoses that are routed incorrectly?
There's the irony.Number 1? very few number one cars...
Its a C body, who's gonna spend $100,000 to make it a number one car, then not drive it?