furyus 67
Senior Member
I would drive it[/QUOTE]Where????[QUOTE
![]()
I would drive it[/QUOTE]Where????[QUOTE
![]()
I would drive it[/QUOTE][QUOTE
![]()
so would I . I wouldn't have to worry about being shot or pimped or being hijacked.I would drive this.
Of the 100s of Amazing bands in 1969 you went for the Association? Lol.This thread has gone a long way! If I may give my 2 cents, I am all the way original only, on the cars that can be reasonably saved. The opinions here vary, based I believe on the age of the member, and how much they Identify with the car when it was new. I rode in them when new, and drove them. So, I fit the older mold. I don't want them better or worse than original. But, I can remember a brand new 69' Sport Fury my Girl friends dad loaned us to go see the Association in 1969. in 1969 My Brother owned a 69' Roadrunner as well. So, our memories play a big part in our choices.There is no right or wrong way to enjoy an old C body. The good thing is, no matter if they are upgraded or not, at least that is one more c Body on the road. A good thing!
One Interesting thing I read here regarding the Single master Cylinder in the 66' . Mine is a late 66', and has the dual master cylinder, and original 24,000 miles. Never touched, documented car. Chrysler did a lot of different things back then.
Yes, Zager and Evans as well. She was a Hottie, and very into the Association. Plus,I saw three dog night in Omaha in 1969. Now That was a Band! I know, I'm older than dirt.Of the 100s of Amazing bands in 1969 you went for the Association? Lol.
One Interesting thing I read here regarding the Single master Cylinder in the 66' . Mine is a late 66', and has the dual master cylinder, and original 24,000 miles. Never touched, documented car. Chrysler did a lot of different things back then.
I never had any acid that was that good!I would drive this.
I think my brain is stuck on the early 80's through early 90's car modding, bigger rear tires, air shocks, loud exhaust etc. The imports were just starting to get played with. I never understood why anyone would want a car that was 2" off the ground and rose like crap. I like having a sidewall on my tires, I think it looks good. I grew up when muscle cars were on the last legs of being cheap/affordable.This thread has gone a long way! If I may give my 2 cents, I am all the way original only, on the cars that can be reasonably saved. The opinions here vary, based I believe on the age of the member, and how much they Identify with the car when it was new. I rode in them when new, and drove them. So, I fit the older mold. I don't want them better or worse than original. But, I can remember a brand new 69' Sport Fury my Girl friends dad loaned us to go see the Association in 1969. in 1969 My Brother owned a 69' Roadrunner as well. So, our memories play a big part in our choices.There is no right or wrong way to enjoy an old C body. The good thing is, no matter if they are upgraded or not, at least that is one more c Body on the road. A good thing!
One Interesting thing I read here regarding the Single master Cylinder in the 66' . Mine is a late 66', and has the dual master cylinder, and original 24,000 miles. Never touched, documented car. Chrysler did a lot of different things back then.
Where????[/QUOTE]I would drive it
are you ******* serious? you would drive that?[/QUOTE]I would drive it
Three dog nite!! Ther ya go!! As far as the customization, I can appreciate all of them. I like mild, mind tricking custom touches. Things that make people scratch there heads(not in a wtf? way). I also like em in the weeds! Flaked out roofs with some tuck roll is cool to! My vision for the fury is a stock appearing interior, exterior,bagged on 18" steelies!!Yes, Zager and Evans as well. She was a Hottie, and very into the Association. Plus,I saw three dog night in Omaha in 1969. Now That was a Band! I know, I'm older than dirt.
Baby boomers have grandchildren. Your parents are too young.I was raised by baby boomers!!